Posts Tagged ‘Canada’

In China, English Teaching Is a Whites-Only Club

Thursday, May 17th, 2012

Chinese teaching agencies are constantly seeking candidates to teach English to the growing number of children who are looking to get a leg up in China’s rigorous academic environment. The opportunity is quite lucrative and requires little or no knowledge of Chinese.

But the ads recruiting these teachers come with a catch.

Take, for example, Mike Lee and Will Evans, students from the U.S. and Canada, respectively, who applied to be English teachers through the New Development School, a teacher-placement agency in Beijing. Being fluent speakers of English, both believed they would make competitive candidates.

What they didn’t know is that recruiters would not be evaluating them just on their English fluency or academic credentials. Instead, they were judged primarily on physical appearance.

“We want him [pointing to Evans], but we don’t want you [to Lee],” the recruiter told them, as the two stood side by side at the front counter of the school. “Unfortunately, parents of our students don’t really want someone Asian to be teaching.”

Lee, who is Korean-American, was rejected from the school despite having previous experience teaching English as a second language (ESL). Evans, a white Canadian, was hired on the spot.

“I was shocked—back home this wouldn’t be acceptable,” Lee told NBC News. “I’ve never been discriminated (against) in that way.”

Racial discrimination is a harsh reality within China’s ESL industry, where recruiters actively seek the blond-hair, blue-eyed all-American archetype (along with similarly equipped Britons, Australians and other native speakers close behind). While brown hair also is acceptable, having a white face is a near-absolute requirement.

Byron Vogue, who works for the corporate English training company Stanford English, said that Chinese recruiters will always prefer to hire Caucasian applicants over their non-white counterparts.

“There’s this concept that if you send your children to English class, the parents are expecting their children to be taught by a white English teacher versus an Asian-American or … a black American,” he said.

The discrimination comes, Evans said, because Chinese parents simply do not believe a non-white person can possibly be a native speaker. Thus, this logic continues, hiring a white person is the simplest and easiest way to ensure that the teacher is truly fluent.

“I was told that it was nice for parents to see foreign or white-looking teachers around the school,” Evans said, adding that he was encouraged to walk outside and greet parents.

Advertisements for English teaching positions are up-front in their bias. A search for “English teacher” in The Beijinger’s classifieds section reveals dozens of ads that include language such as “Job requires American or Canadian white teacher” or “white color is preferred.”

The ESL teaching industry isn’t the only job market in China where being Caucasian is an asset. So-called “face jobs,” where companies temporarily hire a white person to be a fake employee during an important event or business meeting, also are common in China.

Original Article

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook

Chornobyl

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

The 10th anniversary of the Chornobyl nuclear tragedy of April 26, 1986 was marked in Ukraine and by Ukrainian communities around the world. The major exhibit in Canada was displayed in the prestigious location of the Main Lobby of the University of Toronto Robarts Library from April 15 to 30, 1996. Sponsored by the UCRDC and organized by Executive Director Andrew Gregorovich it combined books, photos, maps, newspapers and quotations into an exhibit which was informative to thousands of university students, professors and the general public.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook

Ukrainian Canadian Centennial

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

To mark the 1991 centennial of Ukrainian immigration to Canada the UCRDC mounted a special exhibit in 1991-92 on its premises portraying the history of Ukrainian Canadians. Over 1,000 students from many schools in the Metro Toronto area visited the exhibit. Exhibits coordinator: Switlana Medwidsky

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook

Exhibits Barbed Wire Solution

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

The Barbed Wire Solution: Ukrainians and Canada’s First Internment Operations 1914-1920 is the largest exhibit ever sponsored by the UCRDC. It is a major traveling exhibit which portrays the experience of over 5,000 Ukrainian Canadian men, women and children who were unjustly interned during and after World War I in 25 concentration camps across Canada. After the premiere in Metro Hall in Toronto the exhibit has been displayed in such locations as the City Hall Art Gallery of Ottawa, Fort Henry in Kingston (which was an internment centre), the Niagara Falls Library (sponsored by Lundy’s Lane Historical Museum) as well as in the cities of Parry Sound, North Bay, and Brantford. Exhibit design: Bojak. UCRDC Exhibits Coordinator: Switlana Medwidsky.

“It is truly unfortunate that so few Canadians today, are aware of these sad and unfortunate events in our history. Your exhibition will serve to remind Canadians that we have not been above human rights violations and injustices….”

Hon. A. Raynell Andreychuk, Senate of Canada


Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook

Projects in Ukraine

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

The UCRDC has established a working relationship in the field of oral history with the Institute of Historical Studies at Lviv University. Since 1992 UCRDC Archivist Iroida Wynnyckyj has spent several weeks annually working on oral history in Lviv with support from the Canada-Ukraine Partners Program.

Oral history is particularly suited to fill the gaps in the documentation of life under Soviet rule. It is essential for the creation of archival materials in the realm of previously illegal and censored information and to fill the blank spots in the historical heritage of Ukrainian Canadians.

As a result of activities under this project the Institute of Historical Studies in Lviv has:

1. A collection of over 400 testimonies from people who were eyewitnesses of World War II and other events which were systematically distorted by the Soviet government. Until now this information existed only in the memories of individuals. Copies of all these interview tapes are now held at the UCRDC.

2. A team of interviewers trained in the collecting, documenting and storing of oral history recordings.

3. An oral history manual in the Ukrainian language.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook

One of 10 Most-Wanted Nazi Criminals Keeping Bees in Quebec

Friday, April 27th, 2012

Vladimir Katriuk, 91, whose name appears on the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s list of the world’s 10 most-wanted Nazis criminals, has been found to be living a quiet life keeping bees and selling honey in rural Quebec.

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson and Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney told a group of Holocaust survivors last week that the government would re-examine the case of a Nazi collaborator living near Montreal, according to a participant in the meetings.

The survivors, brought to Ottawa by the Simon Wiesenthal Center to testify against Katriuk, urged the ministers to take action and bring Nazi war criminals to justice within their lifetimes.

They gave the ministers copies of a just-published academic paper that described Mr. Katriuk’s alleged role in a 1943 massacre in Khatyn in Eastern Europe.

“Clearly the research that we presented is new information and I think that they have to analyze it but they have committed to us that they will do so,” said Avi Benlolo, president and CEO of the Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre. “They will look at it and they will get the wheels in motion to bring it back to the forefront before it’s too late.”

The Holocaust survivors also asked for government action against Helmet Oberlander, another alleged Nazi war criminal.

Mr. Katriuk fled to Canada in 1951 using an alias. In 1999, the Federal Court of Canada ruled he had obtained his Canadian citizenship through misrepresentation, but found there was no evidence he had committed atrocities. The federal Cabinet decided in 2007 not to revoke his citizenship.

However, a scholarly paper written by historian Per Anders Rudling, a postdoctoral fellow at Lund University in Sweden, states that recently declassified documents implicate Mr. Katriuk in an operation in Khatyn, whose residents were wiped out over their suspected support for partisans responsible for attacking German forces, the National Post reported.

The paper describes how, on March 22, 1943, villagers of the German-occupied village were herded into a barn which was then set on fire. Mr. Katriuk “reportedly lay behind the stationary machine gun, firing rounds at anyone attempting to escape the flames.”

The paper also quotes testimony alleging that Katriuk was “shooting people lying on the road.”

“Katriuk’s participation in the Khatyn massacre is confirmed by multiple testimonies, and in some detail,” Rudling told the National Post. “The testimonies are consistent in identifying Katriuk as a machine gunner at Khatyn, and indeed in other atrocities. Together, the material produces a compelling evidence that Katriuk was indeed an active participant in the massacre.”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook

Racist rant is typical response from the left

Saturday, March 10th, 2012

He purports to speak for all Jews in his denunciation of the “fellow Jew” Tom Horne (our Arizona Attorney General whose family actually fled Third Reich Germany to Canada). Furthermore, he lambasts Glenn Spencer (a card carrying member of the Jewish Defense League whose two daughters are both married to Jews) as “anti-Semitic” for stating the obvious fact that Jews run the major media networks and that Jews run Hollywood these days (except Mel Gibson of course). In fact, Glenn Spencer’s American Border Patrol and VCT (Voices of Citizens Together) has had a strong nexus with Jews since the very beginning (including with the famous Jew Hal Netkin). Mr. Barlam’s racist rant is typical of the knee-jerk reactionary xenophobia we have come to expect emanating from those who use inflammatory supremacist pejoratives and racist epitaphs to foment hate and push their twisted world view upon others. Their fear-based approach is the linchpin upon which emotional arguments, rather than rational responses to their issues, are firmly hinged. I do not think Mr. Barlam understands what a Jew or a Semite even is. Little less what being “anti-Semitic” or being “a fellow Jew” truly entails. As a Jew, there are many noble causes one may immerse themselves in during today’s tumultuous political clime in order to help change our world to a better place for Jews, and for all people. Hatefully denouncing people with a varying opinion as “anti-Semitic” or Nazi at every turn is simply not one of them. Not every Jew who has a critical eye of other Jews is a so-called self-hating Jew either. It is high time to stop being a schmendrick living in a Spielberg movie and deal with reality. After all, even Mel Gibson eventually had to stop blaming his personal demons upon others.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook

Pro-Palestinian remark cut from Baird’s UN address, documents show

Sunday, February 19th, 2012

OTTAWA – A Canadian expression of goodwill toward the Palestinian people was left on the cutting-room floor when Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird addressed the United Nations General Assembly last fall.

Baird rejected early departmental drafts of his maiden address to the UN that said Canada is a “leading supporter” of the Palestinian people and outlined major spending that backed that assertion, The Canadian Press has learned.

Baird ended up delivering a much tougher address than envisioned by his speech writers, one that unequivocally emphasized Canada’s support for Israel — a position for which he makes no apologies and which has generated much criticism of the Harper Conservatives.

Copies of the draft texts of the speech, obtained under the Access to Information Act, show Baird used a radically reworked text when he represented Canada for the first time at the General Assembly on Sept. 26, 2011.

In his address, Baird drew a parallel with pre-Second World War appeasers of Nazi Germany, saying: “Canada will not accept or stay silent while the Jewish state is attacked for defending its territory and its citizens. The Second World War taught us all the tragic price of ‘going along’ just to ‘get along.’

The only direct reference to the Palestinian people in Baird’s address was to emphasize Canada’s opposition to the Palestinian Authority‘s stated plan to seek recognition of statehood at the assembly.

The Palestinian statehood issue dominated last fall’s session of the assembly, and Canada’s opposition — mirroring that of many countries, including the United States — was well known at the time.

Indeed, the first draft of Baird’s speech noted that “Canada has been very clear that it does not support the recognition of Palestinian state.” The early drafts as well as the final version also urged the Palestinians to get back to the negotiating table with Israel.

But a lengthy paragraph that expressed positive Canadian sentiments toward the Palestinians was eventually trimmed over the course of a handful of early revisions and was eventually cut altogether.

“Canada is a leading supporter of the Palestinian people, having committed $300 million over five years to assist the Palestinian Authority to build capacity in the key areas of justice sector reform, security, and sustainable economic growth, as well as providing humanitarian assistance to Palestinians in West Bank and Gaza, including refugees,” the first draft stated.

It went on to say that Canada provided $64.61 million in development and humanitarian assistance in 2009-10.

“Our support for the West Bank and Gaza demonstrates Canada’s ongoing commitment to assist Palestinians in building the foundations of a viable, independent, democratic and peaceful Palestinian state living side by side in peace and security with Israel,” the excised paragraph concluded.

Three days before Baird’s address, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas formally announced his intent to pursue the Palestinian statehood bid in his own general assembly speech.

Two days before Abbas’s speech, Prime Minister Stephen Harper held a face-to-face meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the UN. The two leaders expressed their mutual admiration and friendship.

Last month, Baird travelled to Israel, accompanied by an orthodox Jewish rabbi from his Ottawa riding, and repeatedly told his hosts that Israel has no greater friend than Canada. Baird told Netanyahu he was proud to watch his UN speech last September.

On a trip to the West Bank, Baird told Abbas in a separate meeting that the Palestinians should get back to the bargaining table with the Israelis — without preconditions — to search for a peaceful solution to the Middle East conflict.

Baird’s office declined to comment on the UN speech writing process.

“The speech he delivered is Canada’s foreign policy,” said spokesman Joseph Lavoie.

Baird’s speech clearly bore his own personal stamp, and reflected his characteristic penchant for fiery oration.

He injected the speech with previous quotes from Harper, Conservative icon Margaret Thatcher, and former Conservative Canadian prime minister John Diefenbaker as well as Winston Churchill.

Baird also changed the fact that the speech writers did not directly mention the government’s plan to set up an Office of Religious Freedom in the department, a promise the Conservatives made in last spring’s federal election campaign. Baird emphasized that point in his actual address.

As an example of religious persecution, both drafts cited violence against Coptic Christians in Egypt. But in the final version, Baird added some pointed criticism of China, adding the example of, “Roman Catholic priests and other Christian clergy, and their laity, driven to worship underground in China.”

Baird also added criticism of Burma for discriminating against Buddhists and Muslims.

And he singled out the East African country of Uganda, a country he has since come to repeatedly criticize for criminalizing the activities of gays and lesbians.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook

Bye, bye, privacy. Canada introduces online-spying bill

Thursday, February 16th, 2012

Move over, SOPA and say your prayers, PIPA. There’s a new bill in the works that, if passed, will pull the plug on how the Internet is used in Canada.

Lawmakers in the Great White North are debating a bill that will pulverize what’s left of online privacy for Canucks.

The Investigative Powers for the 21st Century Act (Bill C-51) is legislation that isn’t new to Canadian Parliament, but after a series of additions and other changes, lawmakers there are expected to begin discussion on it this week. If passed, law enforcement there will be able to monitor all Internet and telephone activity from anyone, anywhere in the country, without having to obtain a warrant.

According to the Calgary Herald out of the province of Alberta, a Conservative-majority government is likely to pass the bill.

Vic Toews, Canada’s minister of public safety, thinks the bill is necessary for the welfare of the nation. “We are proposing to bring to measure, to bring laws into the twenty-first century and provide police with the lawful tools that they need,” he pleads.

Opponents of Toews, however, say that the bill will do far more harm than good.

“I know the criminal justice system is constantly looking for information about criminals, child pornographers etc, but at the same time it seems like an invasion of everyone’s personal information,” University student Jared Exner tells CTV. He’s used the Internet his whole life and is aware of legislation already in place to thwart such things as child pornography. If Bill C-51 is passed, however, anyone operating on the Web or on a mobile device in Canada will be subject to instantaneous, no-questions-asked surveillance.

Towes insists that it’s an issue that’s either black or white. Canadians, says the minister, “can either stand with us or with the child pornographers.”

In an earlier form, the bill died in Parliament along with a provision that allowed “warrantless access” for authorities. A campaign managed to help kill that addendum, but it is back once again. If passed, authorities will be able to view anything, anytime, and some fear that it was install Big Brother over all too broad of a medium.

“It could include anything from email addresses to IP addresses and cellphone-identified numbers,” University of Ottawa law professor Michael Geist tells the Winnipeg Free Press“The ability to use that kind of information in a highly sensitive way without any real oversight is very real.”

By forcing Internet and cell providers to handle IP addresses, profiles can be constructed of any Canuck that details practically every move they make online. Geist thinks of that as way too encompassing of a regulation and questions why it is even needed.

“One thing (the government) has never provided is the evidence to show how the current set of laws has stymied investigations or created a significant barrier to ensure that we’re safe in Canada,” he adds.

Others fear that if Canadian officials have the power to monitor in real-time without warrants, the all-watching eye will seemingly cease civil liberties.

“How can we trust them not to use private information to intimidate law abiding Canadians to protest a pipeline, or protest pension cut?” asks Francis Scarpaleggia, a Liberal MP for Lac-Saint-Loius. Like Exner, Scarpaleggia is opposed to the bill. New Democratic Party member and digital critic Charlie Angus also is against it, and warns Parliament that, if passed, it will turn each Canadian’s cell-phone into “an electronic prisoner’s bracelet.”

“I say to Vic Toews, ‘Stop hiding behind the boogey man. Stop using the boogey man to attack the basic rights of Canadian citizens,’” adds Angus. “Is Vic Toews saying that every privacy commissioner in this country who has raised concerns about this government’s attempt to erase the basic obligation to get a judicial warrant, is he saying that they’re for child pornography?”

Nearly 100,000 Canadians have so far signed a “stop online spying” petition started by openmedia.ca, a net neutrality lobby group.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook

Online surveillance bill will let Ottawa spy on every citizen

Wednesday, February 15th, 2012

Public Safety Minister Vic Toews. (Feb. 14. 2012)

This was the counterattack from Public Safety Minister Vic Toews to a question in the House of Commons regarding concerns about letting the police access private citizens informationwithout a warrant.

Apparently this is our choice: a big brother state or child pornography.

This is, of course, ridiculous. Not to mention frightening. But this is the world Canadians will be entering in a few short weeks once the new Conservative crime bill passes. The provisions that require a warrant, are interesting: the bill forces Internet service providers to have the capacity to record their customers’ Internet activity, such as the websites they visit and emails they send.

Let’s be clear: This is akin to requiring Canada Post to scan every letter that Canadians send to one another — just in case any of them have child pornography.

This costly infrastructure will not only raise the cost of Internet access but it now means that Bell, Rogers or anyone else that provides you with Internet on your phone or at your home will be able to record every website you visit. Disturbed about that invasion of privacy? It gets worse.

Most disconcerting is that police would be allowed to obtain your email address, your IP addresses (which often identifies you on the Internet — your home, for example, likely has an IP address), your mobile phone number and other information without a warrant. As legal expert Michael Giest points out: “Law enforcement could use this tool to capture information of all cellphones in a given area — say at a G20 protest, visiting Parliament Hill, or at a community event — and then require Canada’s telecom companies to disclose the corresponding names and addresses. All without court oversight.” If you own a mobile phone, the government can find out where you go and where you’ve been — again without a warrant.

It isn’t just opposition members who are concerned. The federal privacy commissioner and provincial counterparts are deeply concerned. They understand what this means. As Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart wrote to Toews:

“I am also concerned about the adoption of lower thresholds for obtaining personal information from commercial enterprises. The new powers envisaged are not limited to specific, serious offences or urgent or exceptional situations. In the case of access to subscriber data, there is not even a requirement for the commission of a crime to justify access to personal information — real names, home address, unlisted numbers, email addresses, IP addresses and much more — without a warrant.”

In a few short weeks, this will be our reality: we will live in a country where the government can gain access to information that enables it to monitor citizens online without a warrant. Obviously, the opportunities for abuse are astounding. If you are a non-profit advocacy group that disagrees with the government, you’re probably doubly concerned. Of course, if you are a regular citizen I hope you haven’t written any anonymous comments on a newspaper website in opposition to the Gateway pipeline or attended a meeting about poverty, as this legislation, combined with the government’s new focus on eco-terrorists and anti-capitalist groups (they are as much a threat as neo-Nazi groups apparently), could make you a “vulnerable individual” and so an obvious target for surveillance.

The sad irony is that while the government seeks to increase its powers to monitor Canadians online, it has used the opposite argument — the fear of government intrusion into citizens lives — to end less intrusive programs, such as the mandatory long-form census and the long-gun registry. Indeed, barely a week has gone by since Conservative Larry Miller (Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound) was expressing his concern about how the gun registry would foster a police state.

Before I discuss the bill I would like to review how we arrived at where we are today. I would like to share with the House a quote from former Liberal justice minister Allan Rock: “I came to Ottawa last year, with a firm belief that the only people in Canada who should have firearms are police officers and the military.”

Does that sound familiar? Adolf Hitler, 1939.

You know what really reminds me of Adolf Hitler, 1939? A government that seeks to monitor the actions of all its citizens, to spy on them in their homes and their places of work, to ask companies to record who they communicate with and when. As a father, I agree we need to fight child pornography, but I’m not willing to sign away my — or my children’s — civil rights and online privacy.

I suspect most Canadians, as they learn more about this online surveillance bill, will feel the same way. They don’t want any government, Conservative, Liberal or NDP, forcing companies to record what they do, or accessing information about them without a warrant from an independent judiciary.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook