Archive for January 12th, 2012 | Daily archive page

McFaul Takes Up Duties as US Ambassador to Russia

Thursday, January 12th, 2012

U.S. Ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul (File)

Michael McFaul officially takes up his duties as U.S. Ambassador to Moscow this Saturday.

U.S. President Barack Obama has made better relations with Moscow a cornerstone of his foreign policy. And the main architect of the so-called “reset in relations” – Michael McFaul – is the new American ambassador to Russia.

For the past several years, McFaul has been special adviser to the president on Russian affairs – essentially a member of the White House’s inner circle. He now takes over a position usually given to career diplomats.

But Joseph Cirincione, an arms control expert who knows McFaul and has worked with him, says that will not be a problem.

“Mike McFaul brings some very, very strong cards to the game. Number one – he’s a close adviser of President Obama,” said Cirincione. “So the Russians know that they are getting someone in that post that knows how Obama thinks, his advice is valued and can speak for Obama – and speak directly to Obama anytime he wants. Two, he’s a Russia expert. He’s studied the country, knows its history and has been working these issues at a very high level in the Obama administration for the last two years.”

Experts say McFaul has also been a strong critic of Moscow’s policies – especially those dealing with cracking down on dissent.  Cirincione says that will continue.

“He is not someone to look the other way when Russia tries to lay a heavy hand on its neighbors or for that matter, its own citizens,” said Cirincione. “So he’s a voice for democracy, for forging a new relationship with Russia and very much wants to see Russia integrated into a new European security arrangement.”

McFaul replaces John Beyrle, who experts say was a very popular U.S. ambassador, a post he has held since 2008. Also a Russian speaker, Beyrle was seen as a Russia expert. And his father, Joe, a World War Two paratrooper, was the only man to fight both for the United States and the Soviet Union against Nazi Germany. In 1994, then-Russian President Boris Yeltsin presented Joe Beyrle with several medals for his service with the Soviet army.

Michael McFaul goes to Moscow at a time when relations between the two countries are good.

Experts say the highlight of the Obama administration’s Russia policy was the ratification (in December 2010) of the New START Treaty. That pact limits the number of U.S. and Russian operationally deployed long-range nuclear warheads and delivery systems such as missiles and heavy bombers.

But experts say future arms control negotiations – such as talks aimed at eliminating all nuclear weapons – may be tougher.

And, says Joseph Cirincione, there is still the thorny issue of the American missile defense system. He says Russia believes the United States is seeking advantage over Moscow, knowing that its nuclear forces are slowly declining.

“Basically, they are aging and Russia doesn’t have the money to replace them one-for-one. They are worried that the U.S. is going to seek some advantage by putting up a ring of anti-missile systems around Russia, supposedly aimed at Iran but the Russians believe secretly aimed at them – and then be able to take out Russia’s nuclear forces in a first strike, mopping up whatever is left by an anti-missile system that could shoot down Russian missiles,” Cirincione said. “That is a complete fantasy – there is no truth to that whatsoever.”

But, says Cirincione, the Russians are genuinely fearful and suspicious of U.S. motives.

Experts say one area where there has been increasing U.S.-Russian cooperation is on the question of Iran’s suspected nuclear weapons program.

John Parker of the National Defense University (expressing his personal views) says over the years, Moscow has toughened its stance.

“When Obama came into office, the Russians began to back away from their contract to transfer S-300 long-range air defense systems to Iran. And then they joined us in a very tough United Nations Security Council resolution a year ago on Iran. And after that, President Medvedev issued an implementation decree that all but shut down arms transfers to Iran,” Parker said. “And then he finished off the job by actually canceling the S-300 contract. So the Russians have come a long way on Iran.”

Experts predict Moscow will continue to remain engaged with Iran, given Tehran’s position in the Middle East and Russia’s interest in the Caucasus and central Asia. Analysts say Iran’s suspected nuclear weapons program and how to stop it will be at the top of Michael McFaul’s agenda as new U.S. ambassador to Russia.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook

Historian rejects neo-Nazi accusation

Thursday, January 12th, 2012

Florian Rulitz sees a smear campaign behind the accusation that he had ordered from neo-shipping. Against the police cadets will be determined.

Florian Rulitz explored partisan activities

As the “uncrowned favorite brand of extreme right” is the fashion label “Thor Steinar“, was his client list at the beginning of the hacker group “Anonymous” was published. Besides FPÖ officials, police officers and a Carinthian police cadets also the historian Florian Rulitz as a buyer of neo-Nazi fashion was called. This is now rising against the allegations.

“I’m definitely not a Nazi-ordered fashion,” Rulitz says in an interview with the Kleine ZeitungOn inquiry, he clarified: “I have nothing else on this web site orders.” Aufscheinen that his name and his university e-mail address still in the customer list, can be explained as a result of his research Rulitz. He has published in August last year a book on guerrilla activities in southern Carinthia after the Second World War under the title “The tragedy of Bleiburg and Viktring” and sees himself since anonymous threatening phone calls and stalking exposed. “My research did not fit many people, it has also prompted me to stop my work,” says Rulitz. His name on the “Thor Steinar” list was therefore an attempt to “wipe me one.” In the case Rulitz had ‘demonstrated tremendous foresight adversaries: The customer list comes from the year 2009, the partisan book was published only in 2011.

Constitutional protection checks

With the former Upper Carinthia, which has also not ordered from the harmless “Odin” delivery, the situation is clearer. “The young man was at the time of the order or not cadets. Nevertheless, we take the matter seriously,” said police spokesman Rainer Dionisio. The State Office for State Protection and Counter-terrorism has been commissioned to investigate. “The matter is to be tested clean and neutral. Vary depending on how the investigation is a reminder to all in it to a layoff,” said Dionisio.Pending the results, the 23-year-old remains, however, continued in the police academy.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook

Jewish dog breeders call upon BBC to cancel Nazi-linked film

Thursday, January 12th, 2012

Jewish dog breeders are urging the BBC to cancel a new film about pedigree dogs – because a previous film compared breeders to Nazi eugenicists.

Pedigree Dogs Exposed was aired in 2008. After complaints, the media watchdog, Ofcom, found that the Kennel Club had not been given a proper opportunity to respond to an allegation about eugenics and a comparison with Hitler and the Nazi Party.

A follow-up programme is being filmed for broadcast later this year on BBC Four, but the BBC said similar comparisons would be avoided.

But Jewish breeders want the programme, produced by Jemima Harrison, to be pulled entirely, because of the distress the original broadcast caused.

Dog breeder Mike Davidsohn, who lost family members in the Holocaust, said he had been extremely distressed at the comparison.

He said: “Her accusation of Nazi eugenics against the Kennel Club, and thus pedigree dog breeders, underpinned the entire programme. The Kennel Club was founded in 1873 as a registration service. The eugenics movement was not fully formed until the turn of the 20th century; the early Nazi Party was not formed until 1919. But Ms Harrison charges the Kennel Club with being formed from the eugenics movement.”

In the 2008 film, a voice-over narrates the history of eugenics, (selective genetic breeding), over an image of the Kennel Club HQ and the annual dog show, Crufts. Images are also shown of Adolf Hitler, Nazi rallies and antisemitic signs.

After the 2008 screening, Ms Harrison said: “The film-makers acknowledge that the link between the eugenics movement and dog-breeding is an extremely uncomfortable one for many, but it is nevertheless factually correct.

“It was the horrific events of 1930s Germany that led to the eugenics movement being discredited. And yet eugenicist principles are still endorsed today. The film-makers believe the use of archive footage from the 1930s/1940s was, therefore, justified in order to make the point that the Kennel Club system, which has at its heart the pursuit of ‘purity’, perpetuates a philosophy that is morally and scientifically flawed.”

Now Mr Davidsohn and other breeders have set up a Facebook group with more than 1,500 members called “Stop the BBC making another PDE”.

Jemima Harrison has continued, on her blog, to defend the comparison with Nazi practices. She wrote: “Pedigree Dogs Exposed documented the relationship between dog-breeding practices and discredited eugenics theory as practised by Hitler. The link has been well-documented – including by the Kennel Club’s own genetics adviser, Jeff Sampson.”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook