Archive for June 25th, 2009 | Daily archive page

Court says man brought racial taunt on himself

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

Court says man brought racial taunt on himself

6/24/2009 2:00 PM
By Justin Anderson -Statehouse Bureau

CHARLESTON – The West Virginia Supreme Court has overturned a ruling by the state Human Rights Commission, which awarded a man money because a co-worker uttered a racial epithet at him.

In a unanimous opinion filed Monday, the court said Victor T. Peoples, who is black, incited a heated exchange between him and a white co-worker on a job site in 2004.

The court ruled that in order for Peoples to prove he was subjected to a hostile work environment through racial discrimination, he had to show that the discriminatory conduct was unwelcome.

The court also said that Peoples failed to show that his employers, Sue J. Erps and William G. Erps, doing business as Improvements Unlimited, fired him in retaliation for reporting the comment made by the co-worker.

In 2007, the commission awarded Peoples a total of $32,898 in damages, including lost wages, interest and incidental damages for humiliation.

Peoples was hired on at Improvements Unlimited on April 13, 2004, according to the opinion, written by Chief Justice Brent Benjamin.

On June 16, 2004, Peoples was part of a crew building a wall at a business college in Virginia.

During the work, Peoples taunted another worker, Wayne Bragg, by calling him “white trash” and a “honky.” Bragg later testified that this made him angry, as did when Peoples made fun of his speech impediment.

In building the wall, Bragg was digging holes and Peoples was pounding rebar into the holes with a sledgehammer, the opinion said. At one point, Peoples asked Bragg to dig the holes deeper to make it easier to pound in the rebar.

According to the opinion, Bragg told Peoples: “You say another word I’ll cut your f—ing head off with this shovel, n—-r.”

Both men approached their supervisor, David Yontz, about the situation. Yontz ordered the men back to work in separate locations.
But Peoples was not satisfied and demanded to know what Yontz was going to do about Bragg’s usage of the epithet.

Yontz told Peoples that the situation was over and to get back to work. When Peoples continued his demands, Yontz told him to get back to work or be fired.

Peoples told Yontz to send him home, Yontz again told him to get back to work. Peoples refused, handed Yontz the sledgehammer and told his supervisor “to do what he had to do.” Yontz then fired Peoples.

Peoples called William G. Erps and told him about what happened. Erps told him that Bragg shouldn’t have used that word and that he would handle the situation. The opinion says Erps called Bragg and told him not to use the word again, but didn’t discipline Bragg.

Peoples declined to personally speak to Erps about the situation. Erps made two attempts to meet with Peoples, but no more. The last attempt was when Peoples came to the business to pick up his final paycheck.

Peoples filed his complaint with the Human Rights Commission on July 2, 2004. Subsequently, Peoples complained that William Erps and his employees were following and chasing him.

He said another black employee of the business approached him and offered him money to drop the complaint. Peoples also said that workers for another company owned by Erps’ brother were intimidating him.

In overturning the commission ruling as to the hostile environment claim, the court said Peoples did not prove that Bragg’s comment was unwelcome.

“While we do not condone Mr. Bragg’s comments, we cannot ignore the significant role which Mr. Peoples had in creating the very situation of which he later complained,” the opinion said, “something Mr. Peoples appears to ignore and something which the commission appears to have minimized.”

As to the retaliatory discharge finding, the court said that Peoples was fired because he refused to return to work, not because he complained about Bragg’s comment.

While the commission found that Peoples refusal to go back to work was because the supervisor would not take action against Bragg, therefore the firing was in retaliation for complaining about the comment, the court said the facts don’t support the finding.

The court pointed to William Erps’ telling Peoples that he wasn’t fired — even after Yontz fired him at the job site — and urged him to return to work, but he didn’t.

Share on Facebook

German Jews Horrified by Britney Holocaust Role

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

German Jews Horrified by Britney Holocaust Role

The news that Britney Spears may hit the silver screen as the star of a Holocaust-era romantic tragedy has raised eyebrows in Germany. The plot calls for the pop-star to travel back in time to a concentration camp — and the Central Council of Jews in Germany says the idea is “reprehensible.”

After the 2002 cinematic flop “Crossroads,” few would have been surprised if teen-talent-turned-adult-disaster Britney Spears never again appeared on the silver screen. According to reports this week, though, Spears is weighing a return to acting — and it is a comeback that Jews in Germany are viewing with extreme distaste.

Spears, who is currently in the process of successfully resuscitating her recently languishing music career with her global “Circus” tour, is reportedly reviewing a script for a film tentatively titled “The Yellow Star of Sophia and Eton.” The flick would see her playing a character named Sophia LaMont who travels back in time to fall in love with a Jewish concentration camp prisoner named Eton. In a tricky critique of ongoing anti-Semitism, the script concludes with the lovebirds traveling back to the present day before being killed by Nazis.

Charlotte Knobloch, president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, has said she is horrified at the prospect of Britney making a Holocaust film. “In films that deal with the Holocaust, the script should be carefully chosen and the cast picked with care,” Knobloch told the German tabloid Bild. “It is reprehensible to combine the issue of the Holocaust with Britney Spears in an attempt to secure financing for the film ‘The Yellow Star of Sophia and Eton.’ Ethical considerations should have priority.”

Spears’ music career got off to an impressive start and she quickly became one of the most successful acts of all time, having sold more than 87 million albums. But the 27-year-old’s image has taken a hit in recent years with a seemingly unending series of scandals involving custody of her two boys, substance abuse problems and a number of salacious pictures circulating across the Internet.

Whether her presence on the cast of the new film would be enough to secure funding remains questionable. Her first film was universally panned and she won the Golden Raspberry award in 2002 for worst actress. The “Circus” tour is scheduled to make a stop in Berlin at the end of July.

Share on Facebook

Leeds synagogue bacon shock

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

Leeds synagogue bacon shock

Published Date: 23 June 2009
By Suzanne McTaggart

SENIOR members of the Jewish community have spoken of their horror after bacon rashers were draped over the door handles of a Leeds synagogue.
Police also found bacon stuffed through the keyhole of the Sinai Synagogue on Roman Avenue, Roundhay, when they were called to the incident.

Dan Cohen, chairman of the Leeds Jewish Orthodox Community Group, told the YEP that the discovery of the bacon – a meat banned to Jews – was “shocking”.

He said: “It is outrageous that in modern, multi-cultural Britain we are still seeing these types of anti-semitic activities.

“This is massively offensive. This is no different to daubing a swastika on the door. This is of that magnitude and it’s very worrying.

“We can only hope that this is not symptomatic of growing racism in the UK having just seen Andrew Brons elected as a BNP MEP.

“I sincerely hope there is no link between the rising success of the BNP and what seems to be a rise in anti-semitic incidents.”

The bacon was found at 9am on Saturday morning, 90 minutes before the synagogue’s weekly service.

Bacon and all types of pork are prohibited in the Jewish faith.

Trude Silman, chairman of the Leeds-based Holocaust Survivors Friendship Association (HSFA), said: “Obviously it’s purile, it’s stupid and it’s a hate crime.

“It comes down to anti-semitism. It’s racist. Things like this shouldn’t happen these days but obviously some people don’t know any better.”

The Sinai Synagogue refused to comment on the incident when approached by the YEP.

A spokesman for West Yorkshire Police said: “We were called to reports of bacon being draped on door handles and in the key hole of a synagogue.

“West Yorkshire Police take such incidents very seriously and scenes of crime officers were sent to examine the door and dust for fingerprints.

“Officers also liaised closely with members of the synagogue and we would like to reassure members of the Jewish community that incidents such as this are rare.”

Any witnesses to the incident are asked to call West Yorkshire Police on 0845 606 0606.

Share on Facebook

FBI Arrests Blogger for Allegedly Threatening Judges

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

FBI Arrests Blogger for Allegedly Threatening Judges

By Andrew M. Harris

June 24 (Bloomberg) — A New Jersey man described as an Internet radio talk show host and blogger was arrested for allegedly threatening to kill three U.S. Appeals Court judges in Chicago who earlier this month upheld a law banning handguns.

Hal Turner, 47, of North Bergen was arrested by U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation agents at his home today, according to a statement issued by Chicago U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald.

In the days after the judges’ June 2 decision to uphold a lower court’s dismissal of a National Rifle Association lawsuit challenging the ban, Turner posted on his Web site their names, photographs, phone numbers and work addresses, together with a picture of the courthouse delineating stanchions he called “anti-truck bomb barriers,” according to Fitzgerald.

“Let me be the first to say this plainly: These judges deserve to be killed,” Turner allegedly said in one Web site posting, according to Fitzgerald.

“We take threats to federal judges very seriously. Period.” the prosecutor said.

The judges who issued the ruling were 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judges Richard Posner and William Bauer, as well as Chief Judge Frank Easterbrook.

Unanimous Decision

In their unanimous decision, written by Easterbrook, the judges had said that U.S. Supreme Court precedent, established last year in a high court ruling that struck down a similar ban enacted in Washington, precluded their invalidating the Chicago law.

“The Supreme Court has rebuffed requests to apply the Second Amendment to the states,” Easterbrook wrote, referencing the provision of the U.S. Constitution that the Supreme Court had recognized as conferring an individualized right to bear arms.

“These judges deserve to be made such an example of as to send a message to the entire judiciary: Obey the Constitution or die,” Turner reportedly wrote on his Internet site, according to a 10-page affidavit by FBI agent John Marsh, appended to the criminal complaint filed against Turner in Chicago federal court.

Double Murder

In 2005, the mother and husband of Chicago U.S. District Court Judge Joan Lefkow were shot and killed in her home.

While her life previously had been threatened by since- jailed white supremacist Matthew Hale, who lost a case before her, the double-murder was later ascribed to another man unconnected with White, who whose medical malpractice lawsuit Lefkow had dismissed.

That man, Bart Ross, allegedly admitted to the killings in a note he penned before shooting himself in his car during a March 2005 traffic stop in a Milwaukee suburb.

Alluding to the Lefkow murders, Turner said in another posting, “Apparently the 7th U.S. Circuit Court didn’t get the hint after those killings. It appears another lesson is needed,” the Marsh affidavit said.

Turner is due to make an initial court appearance in Newark, New Jersey, federal court tomorrow, before U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael Shipp. Information about defense counsel for Turner wasn’t immediately available, Fitzgerald’s spokesman, Randall Samborn, said.

April Web Log

Two days ago, Turner was arraigned in a Hartford, Connecticut court on charges he had used his Web log to incite violence against state legislators there, the Associated Press reported on June 22. He didn’t enter a plea, AP said.

In April, Turner wrote on his Web log that 16 of the largest U.S. banks were “already technically insolvent,” failing the federal government’s so-called stress test.

The April 20 posting was cited by the Web site FlyOnTheWall.com, at 8:14 a.m. New York time, after which the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund, an exchange-traded fund tracking banks, brokerages and insurers, fell from $10.75 to $10.62 in six minutes.

At 8:30 a.m., FlyOnTheWall advised readers to disregard the earlier posting and U.S. Treasury Department spokesman Andrew Williams later told Bloomberg News the posting was bogus, “particularly given we don’t have stress test results yet.”

Reached by phone that day, Turner declined to say who would have given him the government data. The results were made public in May.

Threatening to kill a federal judge is punishable by as many as 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, the prosecutor said.

Share on Facebook